It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!Sign In Register
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
“Which virtualization is better, KVM or OpenVZ?” This question comes up often when a customer is looking into a Virtual Private Servers (VPS). While there are many options to choose from, like Hyper-V, Xen, VMware, let’s examine and differentiate between two more common types which you can order in Time4VPS as well: KVM and OpenVZ.
OpenVZ is container-based virtualization for Linux. OS level virtualization means many basic components exist once on the machine, and are used by all guests (like the identical kernel). Each container performs and executes exactly like a stand-alone server; a container can be rebooted independently and have root access, users, IP addresses, memory, processes, files, applications, system libraries and configuration files. This way you use the resources more efficient.
Some pros with running OpenVZ is good performance and less resources needed for the host.
For the end user it often comes with predefined templates that are easily installed with only a few clicks.
The cons the only kernel modules available are the ones loaded by the host and if you are missing something there probably will be no option to enable it.
Because of KVM maintains separate instances for each
virtual server it uses significantly more resources than OpenVZ form a
The pros with KVM is that all applications should work exactly as on a dedicated server, usability of its own kernel, the flexibility of migrating from virtual machine to dedicated server.
These perks comes with a price, the price of more resources needed for the host, meaning a small performance penalty regarding I/O and CPU
Differences Between KVM and OpenVZ